Commercial Items & OTAs

Commercial item determinations and OTA pricing support

A DoD contracting officer treats your product or service as commercial when it meets the FAR 2.101 definition, a prior DoD determination covers it, or the nontraditional contractor rule applies; an Other Transaction instead sits outside the FAR. Either way, the government can still ask for sales history, catalog or market prices, and sometimes cost.

  • 12 years inside DCAA
  • 100+ DoD contractors audited
  • CPA led
  • QuickBooks, Costpoint, SAP & NetSuite
  • Remote, nationwide

Why commercial status is worth the paperwork

If you sell the same product or service commercially, a commercial determination changes the whole contract: no certified cost or pricing data (10 U.S.C. 3703(a)(2)), no CAS (41 U.S.C. 1502(b)(1)(C)), and the shorter FAR Part 12 clause set. It attaches to the item, so it holds up whatever happens to your company’s size or CAS history.

Without it, a sole-source award can bring certified cost or pricing data, CAS, and cost-type accounting obligations, often right when production money is on the table.

Definitions

The definitions that decide it

Commerciality turns on specific paragraphs of FAR 2.101. Name the one you rely on; the evidence differs.

Commercial product, paragraph (1)

Of a type customarily used by the public or nongovernmental entities for nongovernmental purposes, and sold, leased, licensed, or offered to the public. Offered-only claims get closer scrutiny.

“Of a type”

Not identical, but the same kind of item. Expect to describe the commercial comparison item and every technical difference.

Evolved and modified products

Products evolved from commercial ones and available in time for delivery, or commercial products with customarily available or minor modifications. Minor means the change doesn’t significantly alter function or essential physical characteristics.

Nondevelopmental items

Developed exclusively at private expense and sold in substantial quantities, competitively, to multiple state and local or foreign governments. Useful for foreign firms selling to allied governments.

Commercial services

Support services for a commercial product you also offer the public on similar terms, or services of a type sold competitively in substantial quantities at catalog or market prices for specific tasks or outcomes.

A note on the FAR rewrite

The FAR is mid-overhaul under Executive Order 14275. DoD’s class deviations, including those for DFARS 212 and 215, adopt the overhaul’s lightly edited 2.101 definitions and renumber rules cited here. We check the current text on every engagement.

Prior Determinations

Prior determinations and the DCMA Commercial Item Group

A product or service DoD bought under FAR Part 12 carries a prior commercial determination into later DoD buys, including new part numbers with the same functionality and minor modifications, if a DoD contracting officer issued or approved it (10 U.S.C. 3456(c)). Contracting officers check the DoD Commercial Item Database first (DFARS 212.102; 212.001-70 under the class deviation), and overriding a prior determination takes a 30-day review by the head of the contracting activity (10 U.S.C. 3703(d)).

For new determinations, the contracting officer can bring in DCAA or DCMA’s Commercial Item Group (CIG), DoD’s central pricing and engineering team. The request comes from the contracting officer, so your package has to persuade them first. After award, you’re entitled to a copy of the determination memo (10 U.S.C. 3456(b)(2)). Ask for it: the next buyer will find it.

The Review

What the contracting officer actually looks at

A claim gets tested twice: is the item commercial, and is the price fair and reasonable? DoD’s proposal checklist and pricing rules show what gets asked.

Which paragraph you’re claiming

The checklist asks whether you identified the type of claim and its basis. Offered-for-sale, modification, combination, and market-priced service claims also need approval one level above the contracting officer.

The comparison and the differences

For “of a type,” evolved, or modified products, engineers review how your item differs technically from the comparison item. Vague similarity claims fail.

Sales data that stands on its own

Relevant sales data is judged by the age, volume, and nature of each sale, including discounts and rebates (DFARS 252.215-7010). A catalog price that doesn’t match actual sales needs a written explanation.

Whether the modifications are really minor

Noncommercial modifications expected to cost more than the greater of the certified data threshold or 5 percent of the contract price can require certified data on those modifications (10 U.S.C. 3703(c)).

Price, as a separate question

Commercial doesn’t mean fair. After market research come recent prices paid by government and commercial customers, then prices for similar work or alternatives, then uncertified cost data. Historical government prices alone aren’t enough (10 U.S.C. 3705(a)), and sole-source items get extra attention.

Whether you cooperated

If the price can’t be established another way, an offeror that makes no good-faith effort to answer a reasonable data request is ineligible for award unless the head of the contracting activity decides otherwise (10 U.S.C. 3705(b)). Negotiate scope rather than refuse.

Other Transactions

Other Transactions: what applies and what you still owe

OTs aren’t FAR-based procurement contracts, so the FAR, certified data, and CAS don’t attach to the agreement itself (DoD OT Guide). Research OTs (10 U.S.C. 4021) should, where practicable, keep government funds at or below what the other parties put in. Prototype OTs under 10 U.S.C. 4022 need one of these conditions:

  • A nontraditional defense contractor or nonprofit research institution participating to a significant extent
  • All significant non-federal participants are small businesses or nontraditional defense contractors
  • At least one third of total cost paid from non-federal funds
  • A senior procurement executive’s written exceptional-circumstances finding

Agreements often bring pieces back: Comptroller General access on prototype OTs over $5 million (10 U.S.C. 4022(c)), audit access when payments or cost share run through your records, and a GAAP-capable accounting system that controls project funds and your share. On price, agreements officers are told to exhaust other means, such as commercial, market, and parametric data, before asking for cost.

Cost-share accounting

Cost share can be cash or in kind: labor, materials, equipment, IP rights, facilities, and IR&D, if allowable, allocable, reasonable, and consistently accounted for. Foregone fee, cost of money, and profit don’t count, and pre-agreement costs need the agreements officer’s written determination. Track it by milestone; agreements usually adjust if you fall short.

Nontraditional Contractors

Nontraditional defense contractors after the FY2026 NDAA

A nontraditional defense contractor is an entity that isn’t performing, and hasn’t performed in the year before the solicitation, any DoD contract or subcontract with full CAS coverage (10 U.S.C. 3014). The status satisfies the prototype OT condition, and a contracting officer may treat your products and services as commercial without a determination (10 U.S.C. 3457).

Section 1826 of the FY2026 NDAA, enacted December 18, 2025, goes further. On DoD contracts, subcontracts, and agreements, products and services from nontraditional defense contractors are exempt from:

  • Certified cost or pricing data (10 U.S.C. 3702) and the DFARS 215.407 special cost or pricing areas
  • FAR Part 31 cost principles
  • The DFARS business systems clauses, including accounting, estimating, purchasing, and MMAS

The head of the contracting activity can waive or partly apply these in writing, with notice to Congress, and DoD is building the exemption into its class deviations (see DFARS 252.215-7013). The statute leaves the authority to request other pricing data (10 U.S.C. 3705) in place, though DoD’s provision reads more broadly. Either way, the price has to be fair and reasonable, and CAS isn’t on the list.

The Follow-On

The follow-on trap

A successful prototype OT can lead to a follow-on without new competition (10 U.S.C. 4022(f)), as a production OT or a FAR-based contract. The FAR-based version is where companies get caught:

  • Perform a DoD contract with full CAS coverage and you lose nontraditional status for new solicitations until a year after that work ends.
  • Without the exemption, certified data applies above $10 million for DoD contracts entered into after June 30, 2026.
  • CAS applies above $35 million unless another exemption, such as small business or commercial, covers you.
  • Cost-type work brings billing rates and incurred cost submissions, plus the DFARS accounting system clause if the exemption doesn’t apply.

Decide early. If your item qualifies, get the commercial determination before follow-on negotiations. If not, build the accounting while you’re still under the OT.

How We Help

The follow-on is where the accounting changes

An Other Transaction can run on commercial terms and your own books. A follow-on production contract awarded under FAR, or any cost-reimbursable work, brings costs accumulated by contract, segregated unallowables and an incurred cost submission. That is a system question, and it is cheaper to answer before the award. DCAA compliant accounting system.

They can check before they award it

A contracting officer can request a pre-award survey of the accounting system first. The criteria are published, so the system either passes on the day the auditor looks or the award waits. SF 1408 pre-award survey.

What we deliver

The firm is led by a former DCAA Supervisory Auditor who also handled commercial item work from inside a venture-backed defense technology company. We handle accounting and pricing; protests, IP and data rights, and disputes are legal questions we work alongside your counsel.

01

Commercial item determination package

Market research, the FAR 2.101 paragraph analysis, the “of a type” comparison, and sales data organized the way DoD’s proposal provision asks for it.

02

Price analysis support

Sales history, catalog and market prices, and prior prices paid, analyzed before the government does it. If cost data is requested, we scope and build it.

03

OTA milestone pricing and cost-share tracking

Supportable milestone prices and a ledger tracking cash and in-kind contributions against the agreement.

04

Readiness for the FAR-based follow-on

A review of nontraditional status, waiver risk, CAS exposure, and accounting readiness, sized to the actual award.

Questions

Frequently asked

Can we apply for a commercial item determination ourselves?

Not directly. The contracting officer decides, sometimes with help from DCMA’s Commercial Item Group or DCAA. You assert and support commerciality in your proposal and can request the determination memo after award.

If we are commercial, why is the contracting officer asking for cost data?

Commercial status removes the certified data requirement, but price analysis still applies. If sales and market data can’t support the price, uncertified cost data can be requested, and refusing can cost you the award.

How do we know if we are a nontraditional defense contractor?

If you aren’t performing, and didn’t perform in the year before the solicitation, any DoD contract or subcontract with full CAS coverage, you qualify. Nearly all small businesses do. Check again at every new solicitation.

What does Section 1826 of the FY2026 NDAA exempt nontraditional defense contractors from?

On DoD work: certified cost or pricing data, DFARS 215.407, FAR Part 31 cost principles, and the DFARS business systems clauses. CAS isn’t included, and the head of the contracting activity can waive it with notice to Congress.

Does working under an OT mean DCAA will never audit us?

No. Prototype OTs over $5 million generally carry a Comptroller General access clause, cost-share agreements usually include audit access, and a FAR-based follow-on can bring DCAA back in.

Can in-kind contributions count toward a one-third cost share?

Yes, if allowable, allocable, reasonable, and consistently accounted for: labor, materials, equipment, IP rights, facilities, and IR&D. Foregone profit and cost of money don’t count.

More

Related services

Truthful cost or pricing data

When certified data applies and how to keep a proposal clear of defective pricing.

Certified cost or pricing data →

Contract pricing & proposal support

Cost volumes and basis of estimate for FFP, cost-reimbursable, and T&M solicitations.

Contract pricing support →

DCAA-compliant accounting systems

Design, configure, and document a system that meets DFARS 252.242-7006 and survives a system review.

DCAA compliant accounting system →

Guide: TINA and CAS thresholds after the FY2026 NDAA

The $10 million certified data threshold, the new CAS thresholds, and effective dates.

Read the guide →

Nontraditional defense contractors

What Section 1826 of the FY2026 NDAA exempts, how status is asserted and lost, and what still gets reviewed.

Read the guide →

Selling commercial, or headed into a follow-on?

Tell us what you sell, who else buys it, and where your contract or agreement stands. If a follow-on is coming, the earlier we see it, the more options you have.